Mike Gormanās career nearly ended in a parking lot. It was in the mid-1970s and Gorman, fresh off a five-year stint in the U.S. Navy, was still trying to figure out a post-military future. He loved sports and had an itch for broadcasting, so one day he decided to take a chance and pop into the offices of WBZ, a Boston-area radio affiliate, and try to speak to Gil Santos, then a legendary local play-by-play man. If Santos wouldnāt meet with him, his next stop was Weymouth (Mass.) High School, where a friend said he could get him a part-time gig as a substitute teacher.
When Gorman arrived, he was stopped at the security gate. He was asked by the guard if he had an appointment. He didnāt. He was asked if he had a rĆ©sumĆ© or a tape to leave for Santos. He didnāt. Puzzled, the guard suggested Gorman get some experience and come back.
When the guard opened the gate for Gorman to turn his car around, he noticed a hat in the backseat. Stitched onto the front was VP-44, the naval squadron Gorman flew with. The guard, it turned out, used to fly with VP-8. After a few minutes chatting about planes, the guard called Santos. After hearing Gormanās story, Santos agreed to meet with him. The two talked for 90 minutes. When they were finished, Santos called a small regional radio station and set Gorman up with a job as a public affairs director.
āThat was it,ā says Gorman. āThatās how it all started.ā
Nearly 50 years later, including the last 43 as the indelible voice of the Boston Celtics, Gorman is at the end. He will be on the mic Wednesday, calling Game 5 between the Celtics and Miami Heat. If Boston wins, it will be his last game (local networks lose broadcasting rights after the first round of the playoffs). Recently, Gorman sat down with Sports Illustrated to discuss his signature style, how he knew it was time to quit and some of the highlights of a celebrated career.
SI: Forty-three years. How did you know it was time?
Mike Gorman: āItās just that I felt like I was losing touch with the game. Not just the Celtics, but the entire game. And I had spent close to 40-odd years now, having my life dictated by in July when the Celtics schedule would come out. And then the college schedule and the Big East schedule in those days when I was doing about six or seven games a week, it seemed. It just struck me one day when I was scraping the snow off my car. Itās about 3:30 in the morning, weāre in Hanscom Air Force Base. Itās snowing like a bandit. And Iām getting in the car. Iām saying to myself, āMichael, youāre 70 years old. What are you doing here? What are you doing?ā
āAnd that was probably the moment that hit me more than anything else. I would continue on tomorrow if they were telling me I could just do the home games forever. Thatās not a problem. Thatās fun actually. Walk up, show, do the game, gameās over, you leave. Thatās the ideal. But that package wasnāt quite available. I understand why it shouldnāt be. And I have other things I want to do. Iāve spent my whole life doing basketball. Itās going to be nice to, after the Final Four goes by and the NBA playoffs are done, to know that thatās done, too. That now when I wake up in the morning, Iāll go do what I want to do, not what the day tells me I should do or I have to do.ā
SI: Did just doing home games extend your career?
MG: āNo question it did. And it would be nice if these guys [go on] to win a championship now in my last year and give that to me, going out. Iām sure itās high on their priority list (laughs). But yeah, it kind of all came together in that parking lot. I swear, Iām not kidding. Itās just that Iām saying myself, āWhy am I doing this? Why am I putting myself through this?ā It was one of those nights I remember specifically where itās snowing like a bandit. We played in Detroit or someplace like that. Weāre flying home so we could play some other team that wasnāt very good. And Iām saying to myself, āCome on, Mike. You love to do the Celts against the Knicks, Celts against the Lakers, Celts against anybody. Youāre not really wanting to do the Celts against the Pistons anymore.ā ā
SI: Itās been four years since your longtime broadcast partner, Tommy Heinsohn passed away. How did that affect you?
MG: āThereās no lie, every day I think of him at least once about either what he would do in a certain situation. What would Tommy do? I should have a button like that that says that.
āIt did change my style because a good part of my time that I spent with him, Tommy was a bit of an unguided missile on the air, so I had to keep it straight. So I would try to bring him back to reality. I know every time that he would make some really particularly outrageous or perhaps even offensive statement to somebody, I would count to 10 in my head without saying a word, because I was going to make it hard for them to match my quote with anything I might say up against what Tommy just said. And he would look at me like, āWell, arenāt you going to back me up on that one?ā Iād be like, āNo, thatās, no, Iām not.ā But that was OK with him. He didnāt mind. It didnāt affect our friendship. Didnāt affect our relationship.
āAnd Scal [Brian Scalabrine] has been great. He wants the job. Heās got a great enthusiasm for the job. Sometimes he gets a little lost in the trees. I got to feel like I got to pull him out when he starts talking the lingo of the assistant coaches that most of us, even me, donāt understand. But Scalās going to be just fine. Heās funny. Heās a nice guy. As I said, he wants the job and unlike a lot of people I have worked with, he will accept criticism for what it is, and he will try to improve if he believes thatās an area of weakness. And not that many guys do that, especially guys who are ex-athletes, they donāt want to be told anything.ā
SI: If you were going to write a book ā¦
MG: āI am writing one.ā
SI: OK, so what will be the best story?
MG: āWell I want to write a fiction book. Or a screenplay. I think then I can really say what I want to say about a lot of people, but not put their real names down there. I have certainly had my run-ins with my share of characters in 40-odd years. So I just know about changing the name or change the vowel or two here. I can make them what I want them to be or expose them for what they were. And if they can find out who they are by guessing in the book, fine. But thatās my goal is to write a nonfiction novel or write a screenplay, one of the two.ā
SI: Let me rephrase, then: What would your favorite broadcasting memory be?
MG: āItās just in a court sense, when Isiah [Thomas] threw the ball away and [Larry] Bird had the deflection to DJ and the layup and that had taken The Garden from dead silence right before that moment to blowing the roof off. And we had those games. That was before the NBA sold its soul to ESPN and all the other television networks out there and left us, as the locals, out of the picture as soon as the first round of the playoffs were done. And Iāve never really gotten over that, and Iāll never forgive the NBA for that. And I understand owners wonāt need the money, I guess, but to do 82 games and then maybe do three or four in that first round and then see you later.
āLet the network pick up the game, thatās fine. But I think the local broadcasters should at least be allowed to work. Itās a very sophisticated world we live in and they could provide a feed of me and Tommy, for instance, that just went out there. If you didnāt like it, you could take Mike Breen and whoever else heās working with that particular week. But yeah, I just felt so when people say, āWhatās your favorite game? Whatās the biggest moment?ā In the first round, I guess, there are no big moments in the first round. You just got to survive to move on. So that hurts most of all.ā
SI: I completely agree.
MG: āIāll remember all the people I worked with. Iāll remember all the guys around The Garden. Iāll remember Jack, Iāll remember Jimmy, Iāll remember all those guys. And I will, itāll be those people who stick out in my mind, not necessarily the players. Paul Pierce will live forever in my head because I just love Paul. Heās such a good guy. I saw [Rajon] Rondo in the stands [recently], that started all sorts of rumors flying around. But yeah, again, if you ask me one thing I remember, it may not be the answer that youāre looking for, but itās just the fans, itās the people that Iāll think of most. And Iāll miss that most. Itās fun to walk through The Garden, hear people call your name. And theyāre not looking for anything, they just come on, a wave and say hi and say thanks.
āIf I could do one thing over, I probably wouldāve waited until maybe the first of the year to announce I wasnāt going to come back because what itās done, itās afforded everyone a task to come say goodbye, which is nice. But I feel like Iām at my own wake. I just sit there and people come by, they tap you [on] the shoulder. Donāt care if Iām on the air or anything else, they just, āJust came by to say hi, Mike. Thank you very much. Yeah, thank you.ā So yeah, those are the folks I remember.ā
SI: You are a phenomenal play-by-play man. But Iāve always thought one of your strengths is knowing when to let the moment breathe a little. Is that intentional?
MG: āWithout question. I try to tell anybody I work with, and Tommy was a firm believer in this, too, is pretend thereās a third person in the box with you, whether there is or not, and you have to leave him time to talk. And if you do that, then youāll get a nice blend of what the play-by-play guy has to say, what the analyst has to say and what the fans are saying, what the crowd noise is like. I mean, at big moments, I hear guys all the time trying to impose their voice over big moments in the game and let the big moment in the game happen.
āYou can do that later, when youāre reviewing it. But let the game breathe. Let people hear what itās like to be in that seat at The Garden when that layup is hit at the buzzer. Donāt be so worried about what your call is and does your call make ESPN SportsCenter that night. I would say, itās less is better. Iāll take that as a compliment, not as a knock.ā
SI: It absolutely is.
MG: āSo many people come to The Garden and thatās no easy night. If you have two kids, you go to The Garden and you get all the paraphernalia, they get in the seats and everything else, youāre down a nickel before they throw the ball up. So thatās tough. So at least I try to give them a chance if theyāre at home and not in The Garden, to get the feeling for what itās like to be in the crowd and not to have Mike Gormanās voice running all over the thing.ā
SI: Was broadcasting always an ambition?
MG: āIn the Navy, everybody has a collateral job when youāre in the squadron. And mine was the public affairs announcer. And we used to have this AOM, which is an All Officers Meeting, which in the case of a squadron up in Maine as we were, about 50 or 60 guys. And so we used to have these AOMs and I was in charge of all the AOMs. So I used to stand up in front of 60 guys with a microphone and tell them what was going on. And I found that I felt very comfortable doing that. I had seen guys who werenāt comfortable doing it. It was hard to watch them. Theyād read it. They couldnāt handle being in front of a crowd. I started interjecting jokes in it and started doing a little bit of standup before the thing began, which is always my dream that I wanted to do standup.
āThereās not a lot of big demand out there right now for 77-year-old guys who do standup. So Iāll get that in the next lifetime, I guess. But yeah, so I felt comfortable with a microphone, and there was a kid who was one in the squadron and he had worked at a radio station before he came into the military. And he kept telling me, he said, āYouāre pretty much a natural at doing this. You should take advantage of this when we get out. If youāre going to stay in, doesnāt matter, but if youāre going to get out, this is probably the best skill I seen you have.ā So that was my impetus to try to look for jobs in radio. But then I realized once I get out, you donāt just walk into WBZ in Boston unless you get lucky. I mean if that baseball cap is not sitting in the backseat, I tell you, Iām probably the basketball coach at Dorchester High School.ā
SI: You mentioned your affection for Paul Pierce. Why him?
MG: āIt was the timing more than anything else. And I feel like, with him, I watched him grow. And I have a little bit of that watching Jayson Tatum now and watching Jaylen Brown now. But with Paul, Paul had many more hardships off the court that he had to deal with. And how he dealt with them and how he came back from them, I just admired. And we had a little thing. People used to say, āBoy, itās great the relationship you have with Paul Pierce,ā because every time, second time through the layup line, Paul would come and give me a hug no matter where I was. People said thatās great. Well, what was happening was Paul would give me the hug and say, āWho we got tonight [officiating the game]?ā And Iād say, āItās Chris, Dannyās the Black guy, and Joe is the white guy. Heās kind of bald.ā And then Paul would go through around the layup line, Iād see him go, āHey, Danny, how are you tonight, Paul? Whatās happening over there?ā And I swear it used to buy him one or two whistles every game at least.ā
SI: So a lot more time with family now, right? Youāre a grandfather now.
MG: āWithout question. Again, how many holidays did I have to work? You always seem to be working and traveling on Christmas day. But to be out there on Christmas day and to be traveling on Easter to be traveling during stretches like that, you miss a lot. And once you miss it, itās gone. You canāt say, āOK, now Iāll have that second year of life back.ā I want to watch that happen. So to live all this through my granddaughter all over again and to be Pap Pap, thatās cool. I like that.ā