50 Parting Thoughts From the 2024 French Open

50 Parting Thoughts From the 2024 French Open

Cleaning out the notebook and Notes app after Roland Garros 2024. Your 50 Thoughts column for Sports Illustrated … 

1. Another French Open, another title for Iga Swiatek, who cements herself on clay. Her fifth major—and third straight here—entailed her staving off a match point … and also cruising as if playing a version of the sport thoroughly elevated from the player on the other side of the net. Here’s a Tennis Channel interview we did after the final. 

2. A theme of transition echoed through this event. In the first round, Rafael Nadal, the 14-time champ was defeated. In the middle rounds, Novak Djokovic, a 24-time major champ, withdrew because of a knee injury. In the final match, the heir apparent, Carlos Alcaraz won his third major, taking out Rafa-slayer Alexander Zverev in a wild and sometimes brilliant final. Alcaraz, who turned 21 last month, is the youngest player to win majors on all three surfaces. He is now ranked No. 2 and goes on to defend his Wimbledon title. 

3. Jasmine Paolini, age 28, entered as a player on the cusp of the top 10. Still, she was a revelation, such a likable, high-energy player who won six matches in singles and five in doubles. In her first major final—her first major playing beyond a fourth round—she didn’t have much in the way of answers to Swiatek’s questions. But what an event. And she is now up to No.7.

4. Zverev will be devastated to lose his second major final in five sets. After stealing the third set from Alcaraz on Sunday, he was on the threshold ... and retreated. Some salve: he is the only player—male or female—to reach the semis or better here in four straight years. He still has time to break through. In a chaotic week (more on this below) he showed the ability to either concentrate or compartmentalize. But this will sting.

5. Coco Gauff has a winning game and a winning personality. She also has an “Iga Issue,” now 1–11 against the No.1 player, her conqueror in the semifinals. Still, Gauff is now ranked No. 2 and heads to Wimbledon where A) she first made her mark (gulp) five years ago and B) is defending little in the way of points, having lost in the first round in 2023, the catalyst for her streak and C) comes to the surface where Swiatek is most vulnerable.

6. A bittersweet event for Jannik Sinner. He leaves with the No.1 ranking, inherited awkwardly when Djokovic withdrew, but well-deserved. The math doesn’t lie. He also must be happy with how quickly and thoroughly he recovered from the hip injury that caused him to pull out of Rome. In the semis, he was up a set and 2–0 against Alcaraz, let up on the accelerator a bit and lost in a wild and episodically awesome five-setter, another entry into the sport’s hot new rivalry.

Sinner ascends to the No. 1 ranking after Djokovic withdrew from the French Open.Sinner ascends to the No. 1 ranking after Djokovic withdrew from the French Open.

Sinner ascends to the No. 1 ranking after Djokovic withdrew from the French Open. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

7. A few weeks after turning 17, Mirra Andreeva reached the semifinals of her first major, beating the winner of the previous major (Aryna Sabalenka who, yes, was sick) in the quarters with a mature and composed performance. Then, in the semis, she acted her age, could scarcely find the court and won four games against a player she beat last month. But who can doubt that she is a future star and—warning: French metaphor ahead—the barrel of grapes will soon become wine.

8. The running joke: Naomi Osaka should have been awarded the runner-up trophy, having come within a point of defeating and unseating Swiatek in Round 2. It’s odd to use this phrase to describe a four-time major winner. But I would argue Osaka was right up there with Paolini as the revelation of the tournament.

9. El Salvador’s Marcelo Arevalo and Mate Pavic from Croatia triumphed over the Italian team of Simone Bolelli and Andrea Vavassori to win the men’s doubles title. This victory marks Arevalo’s second Roland Garros title in three years. While for Pavic, it completes a career Grand Slam, having won four titles with different partners.

10. Gauff did not leave Paris trophyless. She teamed with Katerina Siniakova to win the women’s doubles, her first major in doubles. They beat Paolini and Sara Errani in the final.

Gauff and Siniakova kiss the women's doubles French Open trophy.Gauff and Siniakova kiss the women's doubles French Open trophy.

Gauff and Siniakova took home the women's doubles French Open title, adding to the American's major trophy haul. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

11. Rafael Nadal may have lost in Round 1, but there was another 22-time major winner in Paris. Top-ranked Diede de Groot won the women’s wheelchair singles title when she rallied to beat unseeded Zhu Zhenzhen 4–6, 6–2, 6–3 in the final. In the men’s wheelchair final, second-seeded Tokito Oda of Japan successfully defended his title by winning 7–5, 6–3 against No. 3-seed Argentine Gustavo Fernandez. It was the 18-year-old Oda's fourth major title. This also marked the first year of junior wheelchair events.

12. An American French Open juniors boys champ … Kaylan Bigun, an 18-year-old from West Hollywood, Calif. Headed to UCLA, Bigun defeated Poland’s Tomasz Berkieta, 4–6, 6–3, 6–3. He’s the first American to win the boys’ singles title at Roland Garros since Tommy Paul in 2015. The first all-Czech junior singles Grand Slam final in history saw No.12 seed Tereza Valentova defeat No.3 seed Laura Samson 6–3, 7–6(0).

13. In the strange (and slightly awkward) alchemy that is mixed doubles … Edouard Roger-Vasselin and Laura Siegemund downed Desirae Krawczyk and Neal Skupski 6–4, 7–5 to clinch the title. 

14. It didn’t rain much in Week 2, but there was still a dousing. Djokovic, pulled out of his quarterfinal with a knee injury, giving up his title defense, surrendering the No.1 ranking and shrouding the remainder of his summer (career?) in doubt. I have been told that he was never fully committed to playing Wimbledon. But now, the conventional thinking is that he takes a pass on Wimbledon and makes a last-chance power drive at the Paris Olympics, held—because tennis can’t quit irony—at Roland Garros. 

15. Speaking of … though he remains entered, it’s hard to imagine Nadal playing Wimbledon—as even he implied. He, too, will focus on the Olympics and, after that, who knows? Roger Federer’s first Wimbledon was in 1999. Thus, this may mark the first championships in more than a quarter century without Big Three representation.

16. Speaking of … Andy Murray joined Nadal as a first-round casualty, falling—did we mention tennis’s love of irony? We did, didn’t we?—to Stan Wawrinka, the other guy from this era with three majors. The chatter that he might play doubles with big brother Jamie Murray suggests that perhaps this is a valedictory.

Murray lost to Wawrinka in straight sets in the first round of the French Open.Murray lost to Wawrinka in straight sets in the first round of the French Open.

Murray lost to Wawrinka in straight sets in the first round of the French Open. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

17. The event gets a lot of heat, sometimes deservedly (the scheduling, shabby treatment of WTA players and vacant seats behind the baseline) and sometimes undeservedly. This is not only the smallest of the major venues in terms of physical space but it also operates under the most restrictive civic bureaucracy. Some plusses: 1) Other events go by way of Weimar Republic pricing. It’s lovely that you can buy souvenirs for under $5, food for under $10 and grounds passes for under $50. 2) Between Suzanne-Lenglen—the roof is great— and Simonne-Mathieu, the venue lays claim to two of the great courts in tennis. 3) The indoor practice courts, allegedly coming soon, will help matters. 

18. Sabalenka was on an 11-match major win streak, facing little resistance. Then she got ill and was visibly unwell during her quarterfinal. Pity for her. But instances like this reinforce how delicate this sport is. 

19. Spare a thought for Stefanos Tsitsipas. Here’s a guy who has been in multiple major finals—once leading Djokovic 2–0 sets in Paris, six games from the trophy. He was part of the sandwich generation, caught between the Big Three and Sinner/ Alcaraz. And now, aged 25, the window appears closed. Also, get this: There were 17 infractions on the men’s fines list for this event. Stefanos and his brother, Petros, were responsible for five (!) of them, totaling $23,000 (all of them for coaching). Perhaps that’s a window into an issue holding him back.

20. A cut-and-paste from last week, but it still holds. Empty suits and empty suites … Tennis has a serious optics problem and it’s especially pronounced here. The grounds are packed. There are no available tickets. The lines for souvenirs and concessions are intolerably long … and the stands in the big court are vacant. The prime seats behind the baseline—the ones shown most often on TV—are about as jumping as Edward Hopper’s diner. Maybe the hedge fund crowd and the FFT suits decided not to show. Maybe they’re drinking wine in a hospitality tent. Whatever. Those seats have to be filled. No other sports league would tolerate this. (We will tackle the issue of no women’s matches in the night sessions in the next mailbag.)

21 For someone who—three years ago, at this very event—ignited quite a cause celebre about her discomfort with press conferences … Osaka overlayed her on-court excellence with such joy and thoughtfulness in the interview room (and on the Tennis Channel set). Tennis brings us plenty of cautionary tales. We should make more of these happier turns.

22. Tallon Griekspoor is such a talented—Tallon-ted, if you will—and versatile player. But his failure to close out against Zverev—a lack of talon, if you will—up two breaks in the fifth set, was downright painful to watch … and, extrapolating, 10 times more painful to experience. Generally, the Dutch tend to do well at Wimbledon. Let’s see how he does. It will take a lot of La Chouffe to drown this defeat.

23. Vote for the cringiest moment of the tournament: Late in his third-set defeat, Hubert Hurkacz—who hardly scans as a firebrand—walked over to his opponent and asked Grigor Dimitrov if he wanted to conspire to replace the umpire. A) The umpire, Alison Hughes, is well-regarded and was on her game in this match. B) Crossing over to the opponent’s side of the court is a serious no-no, as is casual conversation on a changeover. C) You’re doing this at 6–5 in the third set at a major? 

Anyway, Dimitrov, to his credit, confused as anyone, basically said, I’m good, dude, the same way you would dismiss a friend asking to invest your 401(k) in a new crypto. And then he won the match.

24. The morning of the men’s semifinal, Zverev settled the abuse case brought by his ex-girlfriend and mother of their child. He admitted no guilt. Neither was this an exoneration, per se. Under the terms of a settlement agreement, Zverev will pay €200,000, of which €150,000 will go to the state and €50,000 to a fund for charities. The court, the defense and the co-plaintiff approved the settlement in the interest of a “peaceful resolution.” There are innumerable angles to this, not least the strange—at least by U.S. jurisprudence—mingling of criminal and civil. (Was this an assessment of facts? Or simply a transaction?) All of this—partner violence allegations, investigations, the stain of accusations that don't result in conviction—is complicated and nuanced and layered … singularly ill-suited for hot takes on social media. Some see this as the end of a witch-hunt. Others see this as Zverev buying his way out of trouble. Perhaps we find agreement here: the ATP desperately needs some sort of domestic violence policy to prevent a repeat of this scenario. Virtually no one (starting with Zverev, but extending to his most vocal critic) was satisfied with how this played out and the scattershot and clumsy approach. 

25. A lot of talk here about the boisterousness of crowds. I would push back and argue these are some of the best crowds in tennis. Leave Philippe Chatrier and the crowds are spirited, robust, into the tennis and not their phones. Can we agree? A) Zero tolerance for physical threats or physical acts. B) Zero tolerance for noise when the ball is in play. C) Otherwise … go nuts, and lose your tete

There is nothing worse in tennis than a dead atmosphere as background to clinking glasses in suites. Partisan fans, fiercely vocal, on the rim of the court, waving flags, accepting Zizou Berg’s post-match importuning? Yes, please. And a ban on alcohol in the seats was little more than a silly bit of Gallic appeasement. There are guys with kegs on their backpacks strolling the grounds. If so inclined, you’ll just step out during a changeover, crush your beer and then walk back inside.

26. Tennis is hard enough without the element of self-sabotage. Apart from slapping balls—that can end up striking fans in the stands, or on the windpipes of officials—time and again, players offloading frustration with acts of self-flagellation was regrettable. Arthur Rinderknech’s own goal will live in tennis lore. I was courtside to watch Andrey Rublev bloody his knee. And Denis Shapovalov could have used the helmet Djokovic brought to Rome. Yes, it’s a stressful sport. It’s always been. For centuries, players of both genders grimaced at their mistakes but stopped short of self-inflicted bodily harm.

Rublev reacts to a point during his third-round match at the French Open.Rublev reacts to a point during his third-round match at the French Open.

Rublev was visibly frustrated in his third-round loss to Arnaldi. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

27. A lot has—quite rightly—been made of the Italian tennis invasion. Aside from the obvious candidates, here comes Paolini and Matteo Arnaldi, who scored the upset of Week 1 when he beat Rublev. As for explanations, we hear a lot about “investment” and “training” and “coaching” and establishing tournaments whereby players can rack up points (and bring coaches) without traveling great distances. How about this? Italy does not have a major, so players come up knowing they have to earn spots and be resourceful; not depend on corporate support. (Speaking of Italy, we hear that former Wimbledon finalist and current Euro-ubiquitous Hugo Boss model Matteo Berrettini will be back for the grass.)

28. It did not result in controversy. But what a strange choice by the FFT to do away with net-cord technology and—one step from Fingers Fortescue!—rely on the umpire’s discretion to make let calls. I asked the authorities and was told this simply was a “tournament decision” (As opposed to what and whom else?) and that the umpires and players were polled, and were fine with it. Still, strange. At a time when all the tropism is toward technology, why go analog here?

29. Five players who didn’t make it out of Week 1 but impressed: 6’8” French wild card Giovanni Mpetshi-Perricard, young Italian Flavio Cobolli, and Dutchman Jesper de Jong, who took a set off Alcaraz. For the women’s side, young Hailey Baptiste qualified, won a round and then pushed 12-seed Paolini. I had put Olga Danilovic’s name down in the pre-write. Then, a day after upsetting Danielle Collins (out-Danimal-ing the Danimal) she won again and indeed reached Week 2. 

30. Last week we wrote about the mileage players—namecheck Chris Eubanks and Wawrinka—get from the simple gesture of handing a young fan a racket. I’m thinking why not turn this into a social convention of majors? Players have no problem cracking rackets when frustrated. (Remind me to tell you my Hamad Medjedovic story.) If equipment is this expendable, why not give a racket to a kid at a major and make a fan for life?

31. It is a fact of tennis—of any binary sport—that if some players are streaking, others are slumping. Just math being math. That said, Frances Tiafoe cracked the top 10 a year ago. He is now struggling—in an uncertain coaching situation—and playing sub.-500 ball since the U.S. Open. Adjacent conversation: Amanda Anisimova—who came within a few games of reaching the final here in 2019—made a stirring return after a leave of absence. Since then it’s been tough going, including a 6–2, 6–1 defeat here in the second round. She also is no longer working with Marc Lucero.

Tiafoe strikes the ball during his match at the French Open.Tiafoe strikes the ball during his match at the French Open.

Tiafoe fell to Shapovalov in the second round at Roland Garros. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

32. Sometimes we do an item on how one point turned an entire match. There were tons of these intervals this tournament. Arnaldi was a point from going up 2–0 sets on Tsitsipas. Nerves set in and he scarcely won another game. Griekspoor was up two breaks on Zverev in the fifth set. He double-faulted, and missed a routine ball, realizing his nerves were announcing themselves—and ballgame. Late in the third set against Swiatek, Osaka missed an easy forehand into the net and scarcely missed another ball. Sorry to do this to Federer fans but it’s another recall of the 2019 Wimbledon final. You spend incalculable hours practicing—and watching—tennis. And matches (history?) pivot on a few points, a few inches.

33. “Not everything that can be counted counts,” as attributed to Albert Einstein. … Can we retire—or at least refine—a stat? Kei Nishikori won his first-round match against Canadian qualifier Gabriel Diallo in five sets, making him the only player to hold an 80% record in five-setters. Higher than Federer, Nadal and Djokovic. Awesome, right? Except … 20 of Nishikori’s 24 wins came before quarterfinals. And, if my math is right, the average ranking of the defeated opponents exceeded 100. (Diallo, for instance, was No. 166.) This means Nishikori prevailed in the end (props) but expended more time and energy than he should have against lower-ranked opponents. That’s a world away from defeating Federer in a five-set Wimbledon final (as Djokovic and Nadal did) or beating Nadal in a five-set Australian Open final (as Federer did).

34. I always enjoy talking to stringers, the unsung (and unstrung) heroes of these events. Trivia: Which player uses the highest tension? The lowest? The most string jobs? Answers: Norwegian doubles player Ulrikke Eikeri wins at 90 (!) lbs. The other extreme, Adrian Mannarino comes in at 10kg or 22 lbs. Holger Rune played only four rounds and went through 57 string jobs. Gauff topped 50, though note, she played double-digits between singles and doubles.

35. We often talk about the benefits of college tennis. The education and BA degree reduce pressure to win, because players have a fallback when they turn pro. College is a safe haven where players can mature emotionally. There’s the socialization, the camaraderie, the training and facilities. Here’s another benefit: The atmosphere of college matches translates well to the pros. When, say Ben Shelton (Florida), Collins (UVA) or Peyton Stearns (UT) are in a close match, with fans near the court, sometimes amid partisan, even hostile, conditions … they are in familiar territory. On the other hand …

36. Even more than There are too many foreign players taking roster spots, lately the college tennis lament I hear most goes like this: The cheating is out of freakin’ control! I was speaking to a recent college player of distinction, who was describing not just acts of egregious hooking—some of them immortalized on YouTube—but the dark arts of it all. Turning your back on lobs so the opponent can’t see the ball bounce, as you inevitably call it out. Swiping ball marks on clay. Calling a let on an ace. Coaches walk away smiling after their players cheat; conveying approval, but if confronted, offering plausible deniability, Sorry, I didn’t see it. This has clearly gone from isolated dishonorable acts to part of the culture. And it's even impacting tactics. As my friend told me, “I would go to the drop shot more, because I knew anything even close to the baseline would probably be called out.” If honor or shame aren’t the solutions, maybe tech is.

37. Who is old enough to remember when the majors took the unusual step of aligning and announcing plans for a 14-event Premier Tour? Remember that? The effort, made public earlier this year, has lost considerable momentum. The ATP-driven Tennis Ventures—which will include Saudi money on the condition The Kingdom is granted a 10th masters event—has emerged as the clubhouse leader. The hitches: A) Timing. The Saudi event will likely be slotted in the first week of the year, but that conflicts with January’s Australian Open. B) Will this event be joint with women, which will require the WTA to amend its rules (and endure another PR hit for bringing its business to a country with an appalling, if improving, record on women’s rights)? C) Can this be done for 2026, or has so much foot-dragging pushed this to ’27?

38. More from the smoke-choked backroom … Before the tournament, Julia Boserup was voted in as WTA Board Player Member. She did not have the on-court career of Nicole Pratt or Daniela Hantuchova, much less Martina Navratilova, three of the candidates she beat out. On the other hand, she has an MBA from the University of Chicago Booth School of Business … The WTA board chose an American (basketball) candidate over a British (Formula One) candidate and named Portia Archer as the new CEO. (Critically, she will report to chairman Steve Simon.) The Saudi PIF rankings sponsorship will earn the WTA $15 million a year for five years, I’m told. Not exactly Jon Rahm’s or Christiano Renaldo’s windfall. But it will move the WTA from the red to the black.

Boserup returns a ball during a French Open match.Boserup returns a ball during a French Open match.

Boserup reached a career-high ranking of No. 80 in 2017. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

39. Remember Yana Sizikova, the Russian doubles player arrested for alleged match-fixing in 2021? She was cleared in ’23 … and was back playing doubles here, reaching the second round with Anastasia Potapova. 

40. As is the case at most events, a team of gendarmes roamed the grounds trying to spot the courtsiders who illegally stream matches from their phones, looking to take advantage of slight time delays and lay down bets. I’m told that a double-digit number of these culprits were ejected during the tournament. The assumption is that they are gambling. But that can be hard to prove. So these crooks are tossed out, on grounds that they are impermissibly rebroadcasting and retransmitting content. (Public service: if you see someone holding up a phone during a match for an extended period of time, alert tournament staff.)

41. Documentary mania … Federer’s documentary Twelve Final Days is dropping soon. Nadal was trailed in Pairs by a phalanx of documentary cameras. And, not to be outdone, we hear that Djokovic is deep in talks to enlist the filmmaking services of Jason Hehir, director of The Last Dance.

42. The Boulevard of Broken Dreams that is the qualifying draw … Dominic Thiem was snubbed for a main draw wild card, a decision either validated or made to look even more cruel when he lost in qualies. Another soon-to-be retiree, Diego Schwartzman, didn’t go through either. Remember young Dino Prizmic, who announced himself in Melbourne taking a set off Djokovic? He fell quietly in Round 1. Both Fruhvirtova sisters failed to qualify. Same for Aliaksandra Sasnovich, who is (kinda sorta) the last player to beat Serena Williams at Wimbledon.

43. What do Steve Kerr, Duke guard Jared McCain, Pete Carroll and millions of tennis players of all levels have in common? They have been captivated by The Inner Game of Tennis. This sacred text for athletes and coaches—wildly ahead of its time; predating the sports psychology wave by decades—is turning 50. I reread it over Roland Garros (hold your applause, please; it’s all of 132 pages) and it holds up. In honor of the anniversary, a new edition will be issued this summer, foreword by none other than Bill Gates.

44. Daria Kasatkina, seeded No.10, lost in the second round to Stearns. More importantly, she is a player deserving of our admiration, “The Most Courageous Woman in Tennis,” as one observer called her. Here’s a piece we did for CBS Sunday Morning.

45. This is simply a source of amusement and not a gripe. But the press conference translations of French players often make for rollicking comedy. “I needed to control my sensations.” … “In the second set, she expressed vigor.” … Say, how did Caroline Garcia turn around her opening match? “I came back, broke back, and it was important to be extremely solid and robust.” How did Richard Gasquet win the match point? “He was coming to the net on his back shot, and I knew I could shoot the passing shot.” Corentin Moutet before playing Sinner: “It's not my first goal to make people crazy … but in tennistic terms it's a good quality.”

46. I had the good fortune of doing courtside interviews here for Tennis Channel. And—to generalize a workforce of hundreds—it remains so striking how collectively cool the players are. Male. Female. Older. Younger. American. Non-American. Political. Apolitical. Compared to other tennis eras. Compared to other sports. In a vacuum … It’s up to the adults to do right by them, to stop with the self-dealing and flagrant conflicts, to solve the sport’s governance issues and fragmentation. But fans should be confident knowing that, overall, the athletes themselves are deeply worthy of their support.

47. I also had the good fortune of doing some desk work at Tennis Channel with young Noah Eagle, fresh off his Emmy win. So thoroughly professional and dignified—entertaining, without making it about him and his personal brand. A sports polyglot but totally knowledgeable about tennis. Insert Bill Raftery voice: A bird in ascent! ... And speaking of TV, it is interesting how the NBA rights derby impacted the Roland Garros U.S. broadcast picture. The great NBA sweepstakes winner, NBC, which has broadcast from Paris since the 1970s is out and Warner Bros. Discovery will take the court in 2025.

48. It makes for a fun thought exercise. But the data does not support the superstition that a player is better off winning a set 6–1 than winning 6–0, thereby motivating the humiliated opponent. Over the last four years, WTA players winning a set 6–0 win the next set 80% of the time and those winning 6–1 win the next set 71% of the time. (h/t Hawk-eye.)

49. Does Anyone else think that we, as a tennis community, need to crowdfund a Camila Giorgi documentary? Amid this Italian tennis boom … An Italian player who won four titles and pierced the top 30 retires abruptly—before two majors and a minimum of $150k guaranteed—amid familiar allegations of grifting, and suspicion of leaving the country to avoid tax accusations. She is also accused of stealing an antique table. That’s not merely a wild tale. That’s an elevator pitch. 

50. From the icky self-promotion department, subscribe to Andy Roddick’s Served podcast here. And anyone wishing to receive the weekly SI tennis mailbag via email can DM me.

Fin! See you at Wimbledon!

Carlos Alcaraz Is the New King of Clay With French Open Win

Carlos Alcaraz Is the New King of Clay With French Open Win

It may as well have been the slogan for the entire event, in the semifinals of the French Open, Carlos Alcaraz revealed that the key to winning clay court tennis matches was to enjoy the suffering. On Sunday afternoon, and then, as evening spread over Roland Garros, there was more suffering than enjoyment. But in the end, the Spaniard prevailed and won the third major of his ascending career, beating Germany’s Alexander Zverev in the final 6–3, 2–6, 5–7, 6–1, 6–2.

In a strange, mercurial and episodically brilliant match, Alcaraz overcame both himself and his opponent. If he did not achieve the peak level he displayed winning his other two majors, he showed a remarkable ability to turn a tennis match into a chess match, make subtle adjustments and reset after some inexplicable lapses. 

Alcaraz won the first set 6–3, important given that he was trailing Zverev 4–5 in their head-to-head coming into the match. He then dropped the second set, as his level dipped. In the third set, he was up 5–2, on the cusp of a commanding 2–1 set lead, and then lapsed again losing five straight games. He recovered to win the fourth 6–1 and closed out the match with perhaps his best tennis of the afternoon. 

In winning the title, the Spaniard, who only turned 21 last month, is now up to three majors. He is the youngest player to win a major on all three of tennis’s surfaces. He has now—get this—won more majors than all male players born in the 1990s combined. 

Zverev, on the other hand, will be devastated. In his first major final in 2020, he squandered a 2–0 set lead against Dominic Thiem in the U.S. Open and lost in five sets. On Sunday, he was up two sets to one and couldn't close. Zverev showed an ability to compartmentalize in light of his legal matter being discontinued Friday, settling an abuse case brought by his former girlfriend. But this defeat will sting. With time, perhaps he will take solace in knowing he is the only player male or female to make it to the semifinals or better at Roland Garros in four straight years. But now, in his late 20s, the clock is ticking and an opportunity slipped away.

A theme of transition rang through this tournament. It was easy to forget that in the first round, Zverev beat Rafael Nadal, the 14-time champion, who may have played here for the final time. A week later, Novak Djokovic announced he couldn't play his quarterfinal match because of knee surgery. As old kings fade, a new one emerges. Alcaraz brings a versatile game, a knack for showmanship, an ability to hit the gas, but also—as he showed today—sometimes shrewdly hit the break. He now goes to Wimbledon to defend his title and win his fourth major. Did we mention he’s only 21?

Rafael Nadal Congratulates Carlos Alcaraz on His First French Open Title

Rafael Nadal Congratulates Carlos Alcaraz on His First French Open Title

Carlos Alcaraz won his first French Open title on Sunday, taking down Alexander Zverev in a five-set thriller 6–3, 2–6, 5–7, 6–1, 6–2.

At 21 years old, Alcaraz became the youngest men's player to win a Grand Slam title on all three surfaces: hard court, clay and grass. He's also the first Spaniard to win the French Open since 14-time champion Rafael Nadal last won at Roland Garros in 2022.

As Nadal could possibly retire at the end of the 2024 season, many fans see Alcaraz as one of the next great men's tennis players. So, it was fitting that Nadal wrote a congratulatory message on X, formerly known as Twitter, shortly after Alcaraz played his winning point Sunday.

"Congratulations @carlosalcaraz for this immense victory!!!! Big!!!! Very happy for your successes!!! #Vamos," Nadal wrote.

Nadal lost in the first round to Zverev, which was only the fourth French Open loss of his career. Nadal holds the record for the most major titles won at a single tournament with 14 at Roland Garros. He was just 19 years old when he won his first French Open title in 2005.

Alcaraz will play at the next major event, Wimbledon, starting July 1 as the tournament's reigning champion . He has now won three major titles in his young career.

Alexander Zverev vs. Carlos Alcaraz Odds and Pick for French Open Finals

Alexander Zverev vs. Carlos Alcaraz Odds and Pick for French Open Finals

A new French Open champion will be crowned on Sunday with Alexander Zverev gunning for his first Grand Slam title against two-time Grand Slam champ Carlos Alcaraz. 

Alcaraz, the heavy favorite to claim his first title at Roland-Garros, is off a five set thriller against soon-to-be-named No. 1 player in the world Jannik Sinner, while Zverev finally breakthrough after making three consecutive semifinals in the French Open, beating Casper Ruud in four sets. 

Zverev has had a grueling journey to his second ever Grand Slam title, starting by beating the best clay court player in Rafael Nadal, playing two five set matches, and now facing arguably the future of the sport in Alcaraz. 

The Spaniard is the heavy favorite, here’s our full betting preview for the French Open Finals. 

Spread

Moneyline

Total: 38.5 (Over -112/Under -118)

Odds courtesy of FanDuel Sportsbook 

The question surrounding this one will be if Zverev can finally get the monkey off his back and win a Grand Slam title. 

Despite some long matches, Zverev has been at the top of his game in 2024, one set away from advancing to the Australian Open Finals and 12 straight wins on this surface that includes a title in Rome. However, this will be by far his stiffest test against the phenom that is Alcaraz.

Fitness concerns have plagued Alcaraz for much of this year, but there has been no denying his excellence at Roland-Garros. Last year, as the tournament favorite, Alcaraz lost to Novak Djokovic in the semifinals, cramping up in the middle of the match. Can he avenge his own loss? 

There is no denying Alcaraz is the better player, and that’s indicated in the odds, but Zverev has proven to be capable of neutralizing some of the Spainard’s physical success on the court, sporting an elite backhand. 

It’s worth noting that Zverev leads the head-to-head between the two 5-4, winning two of three on this surface, including a four set victory at the 2022 French Open. 

Alcaraz has the firepower to win this match in straight sets, but Zverev has improved on his service games to drag matches into tiebreakers and extend the match. 

An upset could be brewing at Roland-Garros, but I believe it will take a while. I’ll go for the over games as my preferred bet in the French Open Finals. 

PICK: OVER 38.5 Games (-112)

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Iga Świątek Continues Clay Reign With French Open Three-Peat

Iga Świątek Continues Clay Reign With French Open Three-Peat

If indeed this 2024 vintage of the French Open marked the last time that 14-time champ Rafael Nadal played this event, be assured there is an heir apparent. An heiress apparent, anyway. Saturday on Court Philippe Chatrier, Iga Swiatek, 23, won the French Open women’s singles title for the third straight time and fourth time in the last five years. In this afternoon’s final, in what was less a tennis match than a tennis demonstration, she swept aside Italy’s Jasmine Paolini 6–2, 6–1 in 68 minutes.

Recalling Nadal, Swiatek sometimes appeared to play tennis. Other times she was playing an elevated, clay-specific version of the sport. She guided her heavy, spin-drizzled whipping groundstrokes with power and precision. She served capably. She transitioned from impenetrable defense to potent offense. She hugged the baseline between unbeatable and unplayable.

Many of Swiatek’s talents and skills are obvious to the naked eye. Others, less so. In the second round, she was a point from losing to Naomi Osaka, who entered the tournament tied with Swiatek with four majors. Swiatek took a risk on a return. She won the point. And the game. And soon thereafter the match.

Her campaign salvaged, she was never threatened again, dropping just 17 games in her next five matches, adding to her tally of 21 straight wins at Roland Garros. Confidence begetting confidence, on the rare occasion she is made to fight, Swiatek does so.

The comparisons to Nadal—who won only 64% of his majors here, as opposed to Swiatek’s current ratio of 80—are apt. So, too are the comparisons to Steffi Graf, who married skill and athleticism with unflappability. One stat that tells a rich story: this was Swiatek’s 22nd overall pro title. She has played in 26 finals.

Do spare a thought for Paolini, the delightful and winsome 28-year-old, who has emerged as both a lead figure of the Italian tennis invasion and a new star on the WTA Tour. Mid-career, her gifts are finally coalescing. If she is modest in stature, she is overflowing with energy and confidence. She leaves this event embedded in the top 10 and is still alive to play the women's doubles final tomorrow with partner Sara Errani.

But today she had few answers for Swiatek and her battery of skills, which gives her something in common with 126 other players in the draw. This was Swiatek’s day. At her event. During her era.

For two decades, the Big Three was a sort of rhythm section to men’s tennis. Women’s tennis now has a-the-big one.

TNT Agrees to Massive New Deal to Broadcast French Open, per Report

TNT Agrees to Massive New Deal to Broadcast French Open, per Report

The French Open will have a new television partner beginning in 2025.

The Athletic's Andrew Marchand reported Friday that Warner Bros. Discovery—the home of TNT Sports— have agreed to a 10-year deal worth $650 million to televise the French Open in the United States. The deal starts in 2025 and runs through '34.

NBC has broadcast the French Open in the United States every year since 1975, aside from 1980 to '82 when CBS aired the event.

TNT Sports is best known for its NBA coverage, although the future of that partnership is in jeopardy as the league searches for a new television rights contract after the 2024-25 season. Multiple reports in recent months indicate the NBA is preparing to leave TNT behind as ESPN, NBC and Amazon will become its new broadcast partners.

Tennis isn't the only sport Warner Bros. Discovery has splurged on outside of basketball in recent weeks. Last month, ESPN agreed to sublicense coverage of select College Football Playoff games to TNT for the next five years.

While the future of TNT's beloved Inside the NBA show featuring Ernie Johnson, Charles Barkley, Kenny Smith and Shaquille O'Neal hangs in the balance, the network is set to head to the clay courts next spring.

SI:AM | Novak Djokovic’s Injury Throws His Summer Into Uncertainty

SI:AM | Novak Djokovic’s Injury Throws His Summer Into Uncertainty

Good morning, I’m Dan Gartland. I’m very much ready for the NBA Finals to finally begin.

In today’s SI:AM:

🎾 Djokovic’s future in doubt
🎰 Baseball’s greatest sin
🏀 Laurence Fishburne Q&A

The greatest men’s tennis player in history just hit a serious roadblock in his pursuit of adding to his record number of Grand Slam titles.

Novak Djokovic was forced to withdraw from the French Open with a knee injury Tuesday, one day after he outlasted Francisco Cerundolo in a five-set thriller in the fourth round that took nearly five hours to complete.

An MRI found that Djokovic has a torn medial meniscus in his right knee. According to multiple reports, Djokovic will undergo surgery to repair the injury in Paris on Wednesday.

The surgery places Djokovic’s status for Wimbledon in serious doubt. The tournament is set to begin on July 1, giving Djokovic less than a month to recover from the procedure. It’ll also be a fairly tight turnaround before this summer’s Olympics in Paris, which begin on July 27.

“The likelihood is that Djokovic will skip the grass-court swing to focus on playing at the Paris Olympics,” ESPN’s Tom Hamilton reported.

It makes sense that Djokovic would want to prioritize the Olympics over Wimbledon. He’s already won seven times at the All England Club and Olympic gold is the only major honor that he has yet to win in his storied career. He won bronze at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing but has failed to even medal at the last three Olympics. At 37, this is almost assuredly Djokovic’s last chance to win gold.

Skipping the grass court season could also be beneficial for Djokovic because he wouldn’t have to reacclimate himself to the clay courts of Roland Garros, where the Olympic tournament will be held.

But it also seems naive to just assume that, at his age, Djokovic will be able to recover from knee surgery and pick up where he left off. By the time the Olympics begin, he will be older than the oldest Grand Slam champion in men’s tennis history (1972 Australian Open champ Ken Rosewell, who was 37 years, 54 days old when he won). Djokovic’s contemporaries Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal started fading when they reached the age Djokovic is now, both due largely to injuries (a knee for Federer and a hip for Nadal). And Djokovic was already struggling this season before the injury, failing to reach the final in any of the six tournaments he played before Roland Garros. It’s fair to wonder what he’ll look like after rehabbing an injury.

Whether or not the end is imminent for Djokovic, his injury makes it natural to start thinking about the next era of men’s tennis. His career might not be over yet, but it will be before long. His withdrawal from the French led to one major torch-passing moment, as 22-year-old Jannik Sinner will now become the No. 1 player in the world at the conclusion of the tournament. He and 21-year-old Carlos Alcaraz (currently ranked No. 3) are the future of the sport. The question is how much longer they’ll have to battle with Djokovic.

May 21, 2023; Miami, Florida, USA;  Celtics’ Jaylen Brown picks up teammate Jayson Tatum off the court.May 21, 2023; Miami, Florida, USA;  Celtics’ Jaylen Brown picks up teammate Jayson Tatum off the court.

Brown (7) and Tatum will play in their second NBA Finals. / Sam Navarro-USA TODAY Sports

… things I saw yesterday:

5. Elly De La Cruz’s 448-foot home run to dead center.
4. David Ortiz’s call of a home run while he was a guest in the Red Sox booth.
3. This magic bullet pitch that hit the batter in the head and the catcher in the crotch.
2. 16-year-old Lily Yohannes’s first goal for the U.S. women’s national team.
1. Jayda Coleman’s walk-off home run for Oklahoma to keep the Sooners’ pursuit of a fourth-straight softball national championship alive.

Mailbag: French Open Mired in Scheduling Woes, Crowd Noise and Empty Seats

Mailbag: French Open Mired in Scheduling Woes, Crowd Noise and Empty Seats

As it is decreed, Wednesday is mailbag day …

• Here is the latest issue of the Served podcast.

• Here are Sports Illustrated’s French Open Midterm Grades

• Trying to run through as many questions that will not be obsolete by the time you read this. But let’s start with themes … 

Djoker does this every time. He pretends to be injured so he can break his opponent’s momentum and you guys NEVER call him out on it. Disgusting.

@cmt2016

(Editor’s note: This question was submitted before Novak Djokovic’s withdrawal from the French Open.)

• Please stop. Fans like and dislike different players. That’s cool. That’s healthy. That’s sports. But if you’re not going to be generous, at least be reasonable. Djokovic won his third-round match at the French Open at 3:07 a.m. local time. He is 37 years old. He came out firing for his fourth-round match against Francisco Cerundolo. Djokovic played impeccably—something he had seldom done in 2024.

Why on earth would he not want to continue on and win as efficiently and quickly as possible? The idea that he was faking, milking sympathy or playing mind games is just silly, evidenced by Djokoivc’s eventual withdrawal due to a torn medial meniscus in his right knee.

Again, no one is saying you are required to like the guy. No one is saying there isn’t a history of sudden recovery. No one is saying conspiracy theories aren’t intoxicating. But how about a thimbleful of common sense here, folks? 

Djokovic withdrew from the French Open due to a torn medial meniscus in his right knee.Djokovic withdrew from the French Open due to a torn medial meniscus in his right knee.

Djokovic withdrew from the French Open due to a torn medial meniscus in his right knee. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

The dysfunction in tennis is reaching new heights with tennis matches in each of the majors, other than Wimbledon—which has an 11 p.m. curfew—playing on and ending at 1, 2 and even 4 a.m. Much has been written about the abject absurdity of this, including, among other things, the detrimental health effects on the players, the volunteers and stadium personnel who must work at these hours, the disenfranchisement of fans who pay for tickets and cannot stay to view the matches and the competitive disadvantage to the player participants. A lot of kicking and screaming, but no action. Where are the Billie Jean King’s of today who have the guts to confront and change this injustice?

Fernando

• Yes, another event with a match ending at the same time those Tony Little infomercials are running. And—perhaps—another day of headlines not about tennis, but about an unserious sport that allows players to compete (and it’s less well-paid tournament workers to work) at 3:07 a.m.

Can we agree here? We’re all tired … of the scheduling talk. Of the tennis own-goals … Of losing sleep. But here are the variables:

There is typical tennis intransigence and fragmentation at play. Something has to give here. 

Me? I would like to see no night sessions. They are awkward and an obvious cash grab. Doing away with them altogether is unrealistic, but I would like to see a ban on starting matches after, say, 8:30 p.m. But is that fair if one opponent has no day off, and the other opponent does? It’s easy to complain. And we should. Solutions are harder to come by.

As long as we are here … let us stop with the banging on about only men playing the night sessions. The top WTA players do not want to play these matches. Last year, WTA executives marched into the tournament office and expressly asked for players to remain on the day schedule. Their preferences are being heard and honored. 

There are plenty of inequities (and, for that matter, iniquities) in tennis. There are times and issues—I keep hearing about practice court assignments—when women get the short end. This is not one of them.

As journalist Reem Abuelleil put it perfectly in a post to X (formerly Twitter): “Not a single woman I have ever asked has said she wants to play the dreaded RG night session. As a feminist, I support women not having to play a time slot they abhor. There are MANY inequality issues in tennis, the RG night session is not one worth fighting for IMO.”

For all the dangers cited about AI, you’d think someone would come up with an AI-driven way to fill those empty seats for the tournaments’ and broadcasting’s sake. Okay, it’d be a lie, but ...

S. S.

• To me, this is a greater offense than scheduling. The grounds are jammed. The outer courts are full of passionate fans. Suzanne Lenglen is rocketing up the rankings, Mirra Andreeva style, among the best courts in tennis. And Philippe Chatrier, the big house—the grande maison if you will; and I hope you will—is crickets and tumbleweed because fans in the pricier seats are too busy eating canapes in the catering tent to, you know, watch actual tennis from their seats behind the baseline.

If not AI, a decent high school programmer could devise a system whereby the best seats are filled. When the aristocrats finish their goose liver and their last swig of Chateau Margaux, they have their seats back.

Sabalenka charged to a fourth-round victory at Roland Garros, with several front-row seats to the match left empty.Sabalenka charged to a fourth-round victory at Roland Garros, with several front-row seats to the match left empty.

Sabalenka charged to a fourth-round victory at Roland Garros, with several front-row seats to the match left empty. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

Jon, what do you think of the children holding hands with the players as they escort them onto the Chatrier court? I can see how it’s sweet and endearing but I wonder if it reinforces the dated stereotype of tennis being a mild and gentle game. Can you imagine Mike Tyson or Ronda Rousey being escorted to the ring like this? Prime Iron Mike would say, Thanks kid, Now run along and hide because I’m about to put this guy’s teeth into the back of his throat. Actually, that sounds like something that Serena Williams allegedly said.

Kevin Kane, Kingston, Ontario, Canada

• Funny, I do post-match interviews at Roland Garros. As I prepare for matches to end and the next one to begin, these kids are nearby. (I have to keep reminding myself they are not ball kids.) They are dressed in Lacoste, endearingly excited and nervous, and look a bit confused by it all.

I’m all for it. Why not make as many memories as possible? Why not attract kids to tennis? (Spoiler: I am all about a tradition whereby losing players give their rackets to kids in the stands, as Stan Wawrinka and Christopher Eubanks did.) I see your point about the incongruity, but some differentiators: 

A) We are all happy that tennis is more tame than boxing, aren't we? 

B) Boxing doesn’t have “glove kids,” like tennis has ball kids. That is, there is already a climate of players interacting with the younger set. 

C) A tennis tournament pitches its tent in the community for weeks, not one night. 

D) If anything, this speaks well of tennis. Carlos Alcaraz can enter the court holding the hand of a young boy (as I write that sentence, yes, it does sound weird). Moments later he can transition to the ruthless, ball-bashing Minotaur (as opposed to [Alex] de Minaur).

I just finished your midterm report card article for the French Open and as always enjoyed your perspective of the tournament so far. You stated the Americans are "holding their own" and I would like to know your definition of "holding their own." I look at the men's draw and see that only one American male (Taylor Fritz) made the fourth round. I think the results of Ben Shelton, Sebastian Korda and Frances Tiafoe, for example, are disappointing. The women did a little better and had two women (Coco Gauff and Emma Navarro) in the fourth round but it is not shocking that Gauff made it and her draw was really easy. Navarro played Keys in the third round, so it was a given that another American would make the fourth round. 

I remember the days when American men (Andre Agassi, Jim Courier and Michael Chang) actually made the French Open finals and won titles. We have also had Serena Williams win the title and a few women like Sloane Stephens and Sofia Kenin make the final in Paris. Personally, I would rather have one or two American contenders (get into the semifinal) than say three or four Americans making the third round and "holding their own". 

Don't you think most American fans are more concerned with having an American with a decent chance of making the finals than a bunch of American players winning a couple of matches. Your thoughts.

Bob Diepold, Charlotte NC

• Fair. Full disclosure—self-defense—there were more Americans left in the draw when I filed than when I submitted. But it was not a banner event for Americans after all, Gauff notwithstanding. 

Comparing eras is ill-advised. The Big Three carmakers used to dominate auto sales. We are in a different, globalized world. Same for tennis. But I agree with your larger points.

1) Clay remains an American bugbear and, aside from Gauff, the Yanks underachieved. 

2) Diversification is great. But in sports, you’d rather have a unicorn than a portfolio of solid but unspectaculars.

Gauff has been a standout for the Americans, advancing to the French Open semifinals.Gauff has been a standout for the Americans, advancing to the French Open semifinals.

Gauff has been a standout for the Americans, advancing to the French Open semifinals. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

Hey Iga: NBA players are expected to hit clutch free throws with the roof caving in. You can hit a second serve. Woman up.

Thank you, Dominic Ciafardini NY

• This pertains to Iga Swiatek’s scolding of rowdy fans during the on-court interview following her win over Naomi Osaka. I wouldn’t analogize it to free throws. There is a precision required to hit a tennis ball—and hearing is part of that importance—that makes crowd noise especially distracting. I get why players need silence when the ball is in play. (I don’t get why you go here when addressing a crowd after a stirring victory.)

Hi Jon,

At what point are networks going to say enough is enough with regards to John McEnroe? I was watching the Grigor Dimitrov-Zizou Bergs match and it was appalling to hear them making fun of Zizou's name. Does he think it's O.K. to say stuff like this because he was joking? Hey, can't you take a joke?

I was a huge fan of McEnroe the player but he's way past his sell-by date as a commentator.

Any comments?

Ananth

• I get it. And you don’t have to go far—you don’t even have to leave the players’ locker room—to find complaints similar to Ananth’s.

But I’ll go to bat for John McEnroe here. Broadcasters are like tennis players. Different ones have different strengths. Straight talk: does he geek out on the players outside the top 20? He does not. Does he come to the booth prepared with arcana about Zizou Bergs? He does not. When the ball is in play, are there many commentators better at providing insight, speaking plainly, finding nuance and answering the questions posed to them by their well-prepared partner? There are not. 

Besides, too many of his contemporaries are disparaging tennis, playing golf and reappearing only for corporate affairs. Midway through his 60s, John McEnroe is crossing oceans to sit in a booth and commentate on Belgian qualifiers.

Jon,

I just don’t get the Sebastian Korda hype. Everyone says he’s gonna win a major someday, and yet, when I see him play he loses in straight sets. When he does win, it seems like it takes him five (or three at a non-majors) sets against some dweeb ranked 112. (Obviously, I’m exaggerating since he was seeded at a major.) If I recall, his most famous match is his epic meltdown against Rafael Nadal. I’m sure I sound like a jerk picking on him, but I guess I’m more frustrated with the commentators who won’t stop hyping him up incessantly. What’s your view of Korda?

P. 

• I think that’s too harsh by an order of magnitude. He’s a good athlete and player, comes from an athletically successful family and is still relatively young. (He will turn 24 at Wimbledon.) I also question the “hype” premise. Optimism, yes. Even exuberant optimism. But I’m not sure it rises to the level of hype. 

That said, objectively, this stock hasn’t taken off as expected. He’s had a lot of injuries and some disappointing failures to close. Coupled, though, with some big-time wins. (Beating Daniil Medvedev at a hardcourt major is a serious takedown.) Give him time. Meanwhile, this is a fascinating Korda-orbit read. 

Korda fell to Alcaraz in straight sets in the third round of the French Open.Korda fell to Alcaraz in straight sets in the third round of the French Open.

Korda fell to Alcaraz in straight sets in the third round of the French Open. / Susan Mullane-USA TODAY Sports

Jon

To add to the wild card discussion, I would like to see the two players with the best record during the ITF clay court season get two of the wild cards into the French Open. The same would apply to the grass court season at Wimbledon and the hard court season at the U.S. Open and Australian Open. More players should have to earn their way into a major event. This would also make the ITF events more meaningful.

David

• I like that idea. At least the USTA makes players earn the hideous reciprocal wild card based on points. If we are going to have these golden tickets, at least add an element of merit. Not, say, Kristina Mladenovic may be in her 30s and no longer a top-200 singles player. But she was good a bunch of years ago and is French. So, hey, why not let her take the spot of a top 100 player who earned it?

I love watching Gaël Monfils play and we are sad to see him lose. It occurs to me that I cannot recall hearing him say anything [memorable]. Is it me? Is it a language thing? What is he like to speak to?

Sarabeth

• In no way whatsoever is this a criticism. But Monfils’s flair and creativity, expressiveness and—in the best sense of the word—on-court outrageousness do not extend to the interview milieu. He’s professional and courteous but it’s much more of a chill vibe than Nicholas Kyrgios or even Alize Cornet. See for yourself

I once thought that perhaps something got lost in translation. But, no, the French journalists report similarly. Nice guy. Impossible not to like. But saves his outrageousness and flair for the court.

Jon, I've been wholly dissatisfied with how unseriously the ATP has taken the accusations of partner abuse against Alexander Zverev and his associated legal entanglements. Because of this, I personally am boycotting his matches. I don't know how much commentators have focused on this part of his story,  but I imagine Tennis Channel is doing a good job. I skipped the Break Point episodes that featured Zverev too. 

Barbara Katzenberg

Lexington, MA

• Tallon Griekspoor nearly made your life easier. This has not been the ATP’s finest moment—I don’t think many would argue otherwise. My moles on the inside defend the inaction by pointing to the rulebook, the fact that players are half the ATP, the absence of legal resolution and an inconclusive investigation. But our hands were tied is, apart from a regrettable metaphor, a weak response. Plenty of sports leagues—and workplaces—would not abide by this fact pattern. 

I would argue that Tennis Channel has been responsible here. You cannot do what Netflix’s Break Point did and simply ignore these allegations. You also cannot recite them every time Zverev tosses the ball to serve. At some level, this is the same for fans. Some have written him off entirely, as Barbara has. While I would submit it takes a lot of willful ignorance, other fans believe this is—altogether now—a witch hunt, and that opportunistic women are the problem here.

On that happy note … Enjoy the final few days!

Jasmine Paolini vs. Elena Rybakina Prediction, Odds and Pick for French Open Quarterfinal

Jasmine Paolini vs. Elena Rybakina Prediction, Odds and Pick for French Open Quarterfinal

After years of futile efforts, Jasmine Paolini is enjoying her career-best run at the 2024 French Open, into the quarterfinals for the first time in six attempts. 

The World No. 15 has struggled at Roland-Garros but has won four straight to set up her first opponent inside the world No. 70 Elena Rybakina in the quarterfinals.

The world No. 4 Rybakina is enjoying her best appearance at the French Open since 2021, which ties for her career-best mark. Can she extend it and make the semifinals? 

Here’s the full betting preview: 

Spread

Moneyline

Total: 20.5 (Over -110/Under -122)

Odds courtesy of FanDuel Sportsbook

The two top 15 players have played two full matches against one another, both won by Rybakina, but the most recent one was a three-set match on (indoor) clay in Stuttgart (6-3, 6-7, 6-3). Paolini couldn’t make good on her second serves, winning 39% of those points and facing 15 break points to Rybakina’s seven BPs. 

So, how can the Italian close the gap against Rybakina after facing a low level of competition thus far? I’d say it's on Paolini holding serve and dragging the match into potential tiebreak situations. Ryabakina has a vicious first serve on clay and has held on nearly 75% of her 70 tracked matches on clay, per TennisAbstract. However, she has only broken opponents on about 38% of return games. 

A lot of Rybakina’s matches in the run-up to Roland-Garros featured longer matches. In eight clay court wins before the French Open, four of them went to three sets, including her win against Paolini. While I won’t call for the outright upset, I think we see a bit more resistance than the odds expect and this is a longer match. 

I’ll back the over games as my preferred bet in this French Open quarterfinal.

PICK: OVER 20.5 Games (-110)

Game odds refresh periodically and are subject to change.

If you or someone you know has a gambling problem and wants help, call 1-800-GAMBLER.

Novak Djokovic Survives Five-Set Thriller to Advance to French Open Quarterfinal

Novak Djokovic Survives Five-Set Thriller to Advance to French Open Quarterfinal

Novak Djokovic faced quite a difficult test during his fourth round match at the French Open on Monday.

The World No. 1 defeated No. 23 Francisco Cerúndolo after being down 2–1 sets in a five-set thriller, 6–1, 5–7, 3–6, 7–5, 6–3. The match lasted four hours and 39 minutes.

Djokovic was close to losing the match in the fourth set as Cerúndolo held a 4–2 lead. The 24-time Grand Slam champion came back to tie 4–4, then eventually won the set. This momentum propelled him to victory in the final set.

With this win, Djokovic also made tennis history by surpassing Roger Federer for the most Grand Slam match wins in history.

Monday's fourth round match was reminiscent of Djokovic's third round match, which he also won in five sets. Djokovic won the first set vs. Lorenzo Musetti, then dropped the next two before winning the final two sets. It's been a long week for Djokovic on the court, to say the least.

The fourth round win didn't come without other obstacles, too. The 37-year-old appeared to injure his knee in the second set, which caused him to plead for the grounds crew to sweep the court more often. The umpire denied his request.

The reigning French Open champion now awaits the winner of the match between Casper Ruud and Taylor Fritz.